I urge the members of the House Judiciary Committee to include the following questions of Special Counsel Robert Mueller when he gives testimony before the Committee.
- Is it accurate to say that your investigation found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government operatives?
- Was there some evidence of such "collusion" and, if so, in what respects did the evidence fall short of meeting the requirements for a charge of conspiracy?
- Is it accurate to say that your investigation found no evidence of obstruction of justice by President Trump?
- Was your decision not to charge Mr. Trump with obstruction influenced by the policy of the DOJ that a sitting president may not be charged with a crime?
- Did you reach a conclusion about the existence of obstruction which you felt an obligation to withhold because of the unfairness of accusing a person who cannot be formally charged?
- Was it your intention to have the Attorney General resolve whether Mr. Trump committed obstruction? If not, in what forum or manner did you believe that issue should be resolved?
- Do you believe that the Attorney General, in his initial written summary, subsequent press conference and congressional testimony, accurately described the findings and conclusions of your investigation? If not, in what respects was his account inaccurate?
No comments:
Post a Comment